Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) Practice Questions 2026 – All-in-One Guide to Exam Success!

When evaluating whether a trade practice unfairly injures consumers, several key criteria are typically considered. One important aspect is that the injury must be substantial, meaning it must be significant enough to cause real harm. Additionally, the evaluation involves considering whether the injury is outweighed by any benefits that the practice may provide to consumers or to society in general. Another crucial factor is whether the injury is not reasonably avoidable by the consumer, suggesting that consumers should have a fair opportunity to safeguard against potential harm.

The notion that the injury must be directed at a specific group of consumers does not align with the central criteria for unfair trading practices. The focus is more on the nature and impact of the injury itself rather than whether it targets a specific demographic. A trade practice can be considered unfair even if it affects a broad audience or fails to distinctly target certain consumers. Thus, the criteria do not require the injury to be directed at a specific group, making this option distinct from the others that influence the determination of unfair trade practices.